ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2023
Growth of
Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of a viable but non-culturable state in Porphyromonas gingivalis and host cell invasion.PloS one · 2026Article
- Quantifying synthetic bacterial community composition with flow cytometry: efficacy in mock communities and challenges in co-cultures.mSystems · 2025Article
- The Influence of Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation in a Polymicrobial Environment (Streptococcus gordonii & Porphyromonas gingivalis).European journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Hemophore-like proteins of the HmuY family in the oral and gut microbiome: unraveling the mystery of their evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024Review
- Comparative analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- An outer membrane vesicle specific lipoprotein promotesCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) constitutes the primary growth substrate for Methods: Growth of five different strains of Results: Two highly related reference strains (W50 and W83) differed dramatically in their survival when grown on HSA. Strain W83 grew fast and lysed within 24 h, while W50 survived for an additional 20 h. Differential gene expression analysis led us to a gene cluster containing enzymes involved in arginine metabolism and a gene predicted to be lytic murein transglycosylase, which are known to play a role in autolysis. Deletion of this gene (PG0139) resulted in a mutant that did not lyse, and complementation restored the HSA lysis phenotype, indicating that this enzyme plays a central role in the autolysis of Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.