Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570919›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Soil heterogeneity in the horizontal distribution of microplastics influences productivity and species composition of plant communities.

Xiao-Mei Zhang, Xiao-Xiao Cao, Lin-Xuan He, Wei Xue, Jun-Qin Gao, Ning-Fei Lei, Jin-Song Chen, Fei-Hai Yu, Mai-He Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiao-Mei ZhangInstitute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Xiao-Xiao CaoInstitute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Lin-Xuan HeInstitute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Wei XueInstitute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Jun-Qin GaoSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Ning-Fei LeiCollege of Ecology and Environment, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Jin-Song ChenCollege of Life Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China.
Fei-Hai YuInstitute of Wetland Ecology & Clone Ecology, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Mai-He LiSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination of soils by microplastics can have profound ecological impacts on terrestrial ecosystems and has received increasing attention. However, few studies have considered the impacts of soil microplastics on plant communities and none has tested the impacts of spatial heterogeneity in the horizontal distribution of microplastics in the soil on plant communities. We grew experimental plant communities in soils with either a homogeneous or a heterogeneous distribution of each of six common microplastics, i.e., polystyrene foam (EPS), polyethylene fiber (PET), polyethylene bead (HDPE), polypropylene fiber (PP), polylactic bead (PLA) and polyamide bead (PA6). The heterogeneous treatment consisted of two soil patches without microplastics and two with a higher (0.2%) concentration of microplastics, and the homogeneous treatment consisted of four patches all with a lower (0.1%) concentration of microplastics. Thus, the total amounts of microplastics in the soils were exactly the same in the two treatments. Total and root biomass of the plant communities were significantly higher in the homogeneous than in the heterogeneous treatment when the microplastic was PET and PP, smaller when it was PLA, but not different when it was EPS, HDPE or PA6. In the heterogeneous treatment, total and root biomass were significantly smaller in the patches with than without microplastics when the microplastic was EPS, but greater when the microplastic was PET or PP. Additionally, in the heterogeneous treatment, root biomass was significantly smaller in the patches with than without microplastics when the microplastic was HDPE, and shoot biomass was also significantly smaller when the microplastic was EPS or PET. The heterogeneous distribution of EPS in the soil significantly decreased community evenness, but the heterogeneous distribution of PET increased it. We conclude that soil heterogeneity in the horizontal distribution of microplastics can influence productivity and species composition of plant communities, but such an effect varies depending on microplastic chemical composition (types) and morphology (shapes).

Indexed as

environmental heterogeneityexperimental plant communitiesforaging responsemicroplastic heterogeneitysoil microplastics

Identifiers

PMID36570919
PMCPMC9772521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.