Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

The role of face masks within in-patient psychotherapy: Results of a survey among inpatients and healthcare professionals.

Rebecca Erschens, Sophia Helen Adam, Chiara Weisshap, Katrin Elisabeth Giel, Hannah Wallis, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Nazar Mazurak, Stephan Zipfel, Florian Junne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca ErschensDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sophia Helen AdamDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Chiara WeisshapDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Katrin Elisabeth GielDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hannah WallisDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Anne Herrmann-WernerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Teresa Festl-WietekTübingen Institute for Medical Education, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Nazar MazurakDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephan ZipfelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Florian JunneDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Face-to-face medical and psychotherapeutic treatments during the Corona pandemic often involve patients and health care providers wearing face masks. We performed a pilot survey assessing the subjective experience of wearing face masks during psychotherapy sessions regarding (i) feasibility, (ii) psychotherapeutic treatment and (iii) communication, emotion and working alliance in patients and healthcare professionals. Methods: A total of Results: The majority of patients rate their psychotherapy as highly profitable despite the mask. In individual therapy, face masks seem to have a rather low impact on subjective experience of psychotherapy and the relationship to the psychotherapist. Most patients reported using alternative facial expressions and expressions. In the interactional group therapy, masks were rather hindering. On the healthcare professional side, there were more frequent negative associations of face masks in relation to (i) experiencing connectedness with colleagues, (ii) forming relationships, and (iii) therapeutic treatment. Discussion: Information should be given to patients about the possible effects of face masks on the recognition of emotions, possible misinterpretations and compensation possibilities through alternative stimuli (e.g., eye area) and they should be encouraged to ask for further information. Especially in group therapy, with patients from other cultural backgrounds and in cases of need for help (e.g., hearing impairment) or complex disorders, appropriate non-verbal gestures and body language should be used to match the intended emotional expression.

Indexed as

COVID-19face maskshealthcare professionalsinpatientin-patient psychotherapypsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36570852
PMCPMC9779913
OpenAlexW4311858737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.