Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570812›Full record

Trial reportJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2022

Acupoint Stimulation for Enhanced Recovery After Colon Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhihong Lu, Ailin Luo, Su Min, Hailong Dong, Qiuju Xiong, Xinhua Li, Qingzhu Deng, Tingting Liu, Xue Yang, Chen Li and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhihong Lu *Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Ailin Luo *Department of Anaesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Su Min *Department of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Hailong DongDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Qiuju XiongDepartment of Anaesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Xinhua LiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Qingzhu DengDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Tingting LiuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Xue YangDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Chen LiDepartment of Medical Statistics, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Qingchuan ZhaoXijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Lize XiongDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Air Force Medical University · CNTongji Hospital · CNXijing Hospital · CNChongqing Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) in improving bowel function and thus shortening hospital stay after laparoscopic colon surgery within the ERAS pathway. Patients and Methods: From November 2016 to March 2018, 100 patients who underwent elective colon surgery were enrolled and 94 finished study (n = 47 for each) in three university hospitals. Patients in the TEAS group received TEAS 30 min before surgery and once a day for 3 days after surgery, while those in the Control Group received no stimulation. Primary outcome was the time to discharge. Results: Compared with standardized postoperative care, TEAS resulted in a shorter time to first flatus ( Conclusion: Perioperative TEAS further shortens the time to meet discharge criteria after laparoscopic colon surgery in patients under ERAS strategy.

Indexed as

colon surgeryERASlaparoscopytranscutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36570812
PMCPMC9785190
OpenAlexW4312048807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.