ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Less is better than more with resection of periacetabular tumors - A retrospective 16 years study and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes and Complications After LUMiCLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Wide resections of periacetabular tumors create a sizeable bony defect that inevitably results in severe loss of function. Reconstruction of such defects usually requires using large metal implants, a feature associated with considerable surgery extension and complications. The aim of this study is to report resection with no reconstruction of the bony defect. In this retrospective study, we reviewed a consecutive series of 16 patients diagnosed with malignant periacetabular tumors and underwent en-bloc resection without reconstructing their remaining bone defect. Methods: Records were reviewed of 16 consecutive patients diagnosed with malignant periacetabular tumors and underwent en-bloc resection without reconstructing their remaining bony defect. Measurements included: the duration of surgery, blood loss, hemoglobin levels and the need for blood transfusions, data on other hospitalization characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results: Sixteen patients with malignant periacetabular bone tumors and extensive bone destruction underwent wide periacetabular tumor resection with a mean follow-up of 75 months and a mean age of 53 years. The average HOOS score was 46 (range: 20 to 76), and the mean MSTS score was 13% (range: 0 to 15). The mean operative time was 4.1 h, and the mean blood loss was 1200 ml. At their most recent follow-up, patients had a mean shortening of their operated extremity of 4.8 cm, and all could ambulate with assisting devices. Conclusion: Wide resection of periacetabular tumors without reconstruction provides acceptable levels of function and was associated with shorter surgical time, less blood loss and fewer postoperative complications compared to resection with reconstruction. Therefore, this approach may be considered a viable surgical option in patients with an extensive malignant periacetabular. Level III: Retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.