Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570771›Full record

ReviewiScience2023

Pain, from perception to action: A computational perspective.

Zhe Sage Chen, Jing Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Consciousness Research Through Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The Intersection of Interoception and Anticipation Related to Pain.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhe Sage ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Jing WangDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Funding

Central glutamate signaling in postoperative pain regulation - Revision - 1R01GM115384 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Jing Wang · 2015 to 2026
$5.4M
Cortical information integration as a model for pain perception and behaviorRF1NS121776 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CHEN, ZHE SAGE, WANG, JING · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
Cortical Information Integration as a Model for Pain Perception and BehaviorR01NS121776 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CHEN, ZHE SAGE, WANG, JING · 2024 to 2025
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115384NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121776NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS121776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is driven by sensation and emotion, and in turn, it motivates decisions and actions. To fully appreciate the multidimensional nature of pain, we formulate the study of pain within a closed-loop framework of sensory-motor prediction. In this closed-loop cycle, prediction plays an important role, as the interaction between prediction and actual sensory experience shapes pain perception and subsequently, action. In this Perspective, we describe the roles of two prominent computational theories-Bayesian inference and reinforcement learning-in modeling adaptive pain behaviors. We show that prediction serves as a common theme between these two theories, and that each of these theories can explain unique aspects of the pain perception-action cycle. We discuss how these computational theories and models can improve our mechanistic understandings of pain-centered processes such as anticipation, attention, placebo hypoalgesia, and pain chronification.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsNeuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36570771
PMCPMC9771728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.