ArticleHemaSphere2023
Machine Learning Improves Risk Stratification in Myelofibrosis: An Analysis of the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis.
Article in HemaSphere, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Practice Recommendations for Myelofibrosis Management in the Asia-Pacific Region: The APAC-MF Alliance.JCO oncology practice · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating novel therapeutic strategies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Driving disease-directed progress.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Prognostic Scores and Risk Stratification of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: 2026 Updates.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for risk assessment and outcome prediction in malignant haematology.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Article
- Optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: eligibility, best practices, and improving transplant outcomes.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- DNA Methylation in Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Prognostic Role and Therapeutic Implications.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Role of molecular alterations in transplantation decisions for patients with primary myelofibrosis.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence to myeloproliferative neoplasms: a narrative review.Expert review of hematology · 2024Review
- Refining risk prediction in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia through DNA methylation profiling.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Integrating AIPSS-MF and molecular predictors: A comparative analysis of prognostic models for myelofibrosis.HemaSphere · 2024Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with CALR-mutated myelofibrosis: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Article
- AIPSS-MF machine learning prognostic score validation in a cohort of myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Molecular Studies for the Early Detection of Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnostic Cytology and Genomic Testing for Hematologic Disorders.Cells · 2023Review
- Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical Manifestations, Molecular Profiles, and Treatments.Cancers · 2023Review
- Myelofibrosis and Survival Prognostic Models: A Journey between Past and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with heterogeneous clinical course. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy, but its morbidity and mortality require careful candidate selection. Therefore, accurate disease risk prognostication is critical for treatment decision-making. We obtained registry data from patients diagnosed with MF in 60 Spanish institutions (N = 1386). These were randomly divided into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). A machine learning (ML) technique (random forest) was used to model overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in the training set, and the results were validated in the test set. We derived the AIPSS-MF (Artificial Intelligence Prognostic Scoring System for Myelofibrosis) model, which was based on 8 clinical variables at diagnosis and achieved high accuracy in predicting OS (training set c-index, 0.750; test set c-index, 0.744) and LFS (training set c-index, 0.697; test set c-index, 0.703). No improvement was obtained with the inclusion of MPN driver mutations in the model. We were unable to adequately assess the potential benefit of including adverse cytogenetics or high-risk mutations due to the lack of these data in many patients. AIPSS-MF was superior to the IPSS regardless of MF subtype and age range and outperformed the MYSEC-PM in patients with secondary MF. In conclusion, we have developed a prediction model based exclusively on clinical variables that provides individualized prognostic estimates in patients with primary and secondary MF. The use of AIPSS-MF in combination with predictive models that incorporate genetic information may improve disease risk stratification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.