Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570665›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2022

Magnetic neutron scattering from spherical nanoparticles with Néel surface anisotropy: analytical treatment.

Michael P Adams, Andreas Michels, Hamid Kachkachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael P AdamsDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, 162A avenue de la Faiencerie, L-1511 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-8087
Andreas MichelsDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, 162A avenue de la Faiencerie, L-1511 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-295X
Hamid KachkachiLaboratoire PROMES CNRS UPR8521, Université de Perpignan via Domitia, Rambla de la Thermodynamique, Tecnosud, F-66100 Perpignan, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-8117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnetization profile and the related magnetic small-angle neutron scattering cross section of a single spherical nanoparticle with Néel surface anisotropy are analytically investigated. A Hamiltonian is employed that comprises the isotropic exchange interaction, an external magnetic field, a uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy in the core of the particle and the Néel anisotropy at the surface. Using a perturbation approach, the determination of the magnetization profile can be reduced to a Helmholtz equation with Neumann boundary condition, whose solution is represented by an infinite series in terms of spherical harmonics and spherical Bessel functions. From the resulting infinite series expansion, the Fourier transform, which is algebraically related to the magnetic small-angle neutron scattering cross section, is analytically calculated. The approximate analytical solution for the spin structure is compared with the numerical solution using the Landau-Lifshitz equation, which accounts for the full nonlinearity of the problem. The signature of the Néel surface anisotropy can be identified in the magnetic neutron scattering observables, but its effect is relatively small, even for large values of the surface anisotropy constant.

Indexed as

magnetic nanoparticlesmagnetic neutron scatteringmicromagneticssmall-angle neutron scatteringsurface anisotropy

Identifiers

PMID36570665
PMCPMC9721331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.