ArticleProstate international2022
Comparison of three questionnaire forms used in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms: A prospective study.
Article in Prostate international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Cognitive Impairment Among Participants in the REGARDS Cohort Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures in penile cancer: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Article
- Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg as an initial dose in 1,219 Korean patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms: data from a phase IV study.Prostate international · 2023Article
- Treating LUTS in Men with Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Review Article.Drugs & aging · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Questionnaire forms (QFs) are used in the evaluation of all patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs). Our study aims to investigate the compatibility of the three QFs with each other and to investigate the relationship between education level and complete completion of these forms. Materials and methods: A total of 224 patients between February 2018 and February 2019 were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups as primary, intermediate, and advanced according to their education level and the patients who gave incomplete answers to the questions were determined. Results: The mean age of the patients was 61.0 ± 7.57(45-85), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) value was 16.2 ± 8.3(1-35), the international incontinence form-male lower urinary tract symptoms (ICIQ-MLUTS) value was 16.5 ± 7.9(0-38), the visual prostate symptom score (VPSS) value was 9.9 ± 3.0(3-16). There was a significant correlation between the three QFs ( Conclusions: Each QF has its advantages and disadvantages. The strong correlation between IPSS and ICIQ-MLUTS found in our study indicates that these tools can be used interchangeably in daily clinical practice. ICIQ-MLUTS can evaluate symptoms that are not present in other QFs. In the evaluation of illiterate patients, VPSS should be used without any alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.