Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570621›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2022

Ocular Health and National Data Standards: A Case for Including Visual Acuity in the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI).

Sally L Baxter, Amberlynn A Reed, April Maa, Michael V Boland, Durga S Borkar, Eric N Brown, Flora Lum, Kerry E Goetz

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. The march to harmonized imaging standards for retinal imaging.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Research data warehouse best practices: catalyzing national data sharing through informatics innovation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sally L BaxterLa Jolla, California.
Amberlynn A ReedBethesda, Maryland.
April MaaAtlanta, Georgia.
Michael V BolandBoston, Massachusetts.
Durga S BorkarDurham, North Carolina.
Eric N BrownNashville, Tennessee.
Flora LumSan Francisco, California.
Kerry E GoetzBethesda, Maryland.

Funding

Multi-modal Health Information Technology Innovations for Precision Management of GlaucomaDP5OD029610 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NIH HHS DP5 OD029610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

data standardsdiabetic retinopathyhealth information interoperabilitypublic healthvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID36570621
PMCPMC9767820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.