Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570602›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2023

Temporal model for central sensitization: A hypothesis for mechanism and treatment using systemic manual therapy, a focused review.

Adi Halili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Central sensitization-related symptoms in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: development and internal validation of a clinical prediction rule for first-stage screening.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adi HaliliHalili Physical Therapy 268 E River suite 130 Tucson AZ 85704.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this focused review is to develop a consolidated hypothesis as to the causes and mechanisms of central sensitization and a related model for a treatment approach using Systemic Manual Therapy (SMT). The key to understanding central sensitization is a firm grasp on structure and function of the Locus-coeruleus noradrenaline system (LC-NA). This system uses an elaborate switching mechanism to control the level and rate of activation of multiple systems. This review evaluates the mechanisms and temporal relationships behind four components: salient stimuli, threat coding, aberrant afferent input, and oxidative stress. The five-stage temporal model for central sensitization includes phasic activation of the LC-NA system, salient stimuli, threat coding of salient stimuli, central sensitization, and neural degeneration. The three components of treatment include temporarily reducing afferent visceral input, shifting humoral inflammatory activity away from the brain and outside the body, and reducing oxidative stress by making oxygenated blood more available around the LC and other stressed areas in the brain. The SMT protocols that could help in reduction of visceral afferent input are GUOU, Barral and LAUG. Protocols that should shift humoral inflammatory activity away from the brain or completely out of the body include UD and DCS. One protocol that can potentially reduce oxidative stress by making oxygenated blood more available around the LC is CCCV. Future research and hypothesis-testing strategies as well as limitations are further discussed.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseCentral sensitizationChronic painEhlers-Danlos syndromeFibromyalgiaLong COVID syndromeMast cell activation syndromeParkinson's diseaseSystemic manual therapyWhiplash associated disorders

Identifiers

PMID36570602
PMCPMC9772546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.