ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2022
Tetracycline impregnated bone grafts in the management of
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous guided bone regeneration: a comprehensive narrative review.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Alb-PRF Hybrid Membranes Functionalized with Carbonated Hydroxyapatite and Doxycycline for Bone Regeneration and Antimicrobial Control: An In Vitro Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Risk factors and prediction model of peri-implantitis in post operative periodontitis patients.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Surgical regenerative methods for peri-implantitis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Systemic and Local Antibiotic Therapy in the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rehabilitation of dental arches with the help of dental implants has been revolutionary and a significant part of research is devoted to increasing its success rate. One of the most common causes of failure of dental implants is Aim and objectives: This study aimed to test the efficacy of bone grafts incorporating tetracycline and its derivatives in the treatment of Methods: A thorough search was made on eminent databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library database for published literature on tetracycline impregnated bone grafts used either in the management of Results: Nine potentially eligible full-text published articles including case reports, case series, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials were selected for review. Most of the studies reviewed; reported a reduction in probing depth and an increase in bone height and density after placement of tetracycline bone grafts around the dental implant. Conclusion: The incorporation of tetracycline into the bone grafts shows promising results as an agent of local delivery around dental implants in the management of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.