Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570440›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

CT after interhospital transfer in acute ischemic stroke: Imaging findings and impact of prior intravenous contrast administration.

Franziska Mueller, Matthias P Fabritius, Lena Stueckelschweiger, Sophia Kiesl, Sebastian Moench, Steffen Tiedt, Jan Rémi, Lars Kellert, Moriz Herzberg, Clemens Küpper and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franziska MuellerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias P FabritiusDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lena StueckelschweigerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sophia KieslDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian MoenchDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Steffen TiedtInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan RémiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lars KellertDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Moriz HerzbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Clemens KüpperDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Konstantinos DimitriadisInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel Puhr-WesterheideDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas LiebigDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paul ReidlerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke patients routinely undergo interhospital transfer to endovascular thrombectomy capable centers. Imaging is often repeated with residual intravenous (IV) iodine contrast at post-transfer assessment. We determined imaging findings and the impact of residual contrast on secondary imaging. Anterior circulation LVO stroke patients were selected out of a consecutive cohort. Directly admitted patients were contrast naïve, and transferred patients had previously received IV iodine contrast for stroke assessment at the referring hospital. Two independent readers rated the visibility of residual contrast on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) after transfer and assessed the hyperdense vessel sign. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to investigate the association of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) with prior contrast administration, time from symptom onset (TFSO), and CTP ischemic core volume in both directly admitted and transferred patients. Results: We included 161 patients, with 62 (39%) transferred and 99 (62%) directly admitted patients. Compared between these groups, transferred patients had a longer TFSO-to-imaging at our institution (median: 212 vs. 75 min, Conclusion: Imaging alterations due to residual IV contrast are frequent in clinical practice and render the hyperdense vessel sign largely indetectable. Larger studies are needed to clarify the influence on the association between ASPECTS and ischemic core.

Indexed as

CTinterhospital transferIV contrastperfusionstroke

Identifiers

PMID36570440
PMCPMC9767970
OpenAlexW4310795021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.