ArticleProgress in pediatric cardiology2021
Pediatric cardiology national education series: A remote education response to COVID-19.
Article in Progress in pediatric cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Entrustable Professional Activities and Their Relevance to Pediatric Cardiology Training.Pediatric cardiology · 2023Review
- Sustained improvement in fellows' echocardiographic completeness through the coronavirus pandemic with a standardised imaging protocol.Cardiology in the young · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Medical education experienced widespread disruption during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, members of the Society of Pediatric Cardiology Training Program Directors (SPCTPD) created a series of live, Zoom-based lectures for pediatric cardiology fellows. The goals were to support fellow didactic education and connect fellows and faculty during the pandemic. We sought to determine the impact of the lecture series on pediatric cardiology fellows around the country. Methods: Pediatric cardiology experts from across the country volunteered to give lectures in the Pediatric Cardiology National Education Series (PC-NES). Lectures were held online once or twice weekly for 3 months during Spring 2020, while many fellows had modified clinical responsibilities. Fellows voluntarily completed an online survey before and after the lecture series. Results: On the initial survey, a majority of fellows responded they would benefit from more didactic education while their training was impacted by COVID-19. After the series concluded, almost all (95%) fellows responded that PC-NES lectures were valuable supplements to their training during COVID-19. They included quality of lectures, board-relevance, and a way to connect to the pediatric cardiology community as key reasons for participating in PC-NES, and 100% responded they felt PC-NES should continue in some capacity. Conclusion: The PC-NES was a low-cost, simple way to deliver high-quality supplemental education to pediatric cardiology fellows, help trainees build a network of peers and learn from experts outside their home institution. Similar models could connect other pediatric trainees at local, regional, or national levels, and provide valuable supplemental education opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.