Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570364›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2022

Circulating tumor cells and cell-free tumor DNA analyses in urothelial cancer using the LiquidBiopsy platform.

Minoru Kobayashi, Hideyuki Abe, Kyoko Arai, Satoshi Murakami, Takao Kamai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: towards precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Minoru KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Utsunomiya Memorial Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Hideyuki AbeDepartment of Urology, Yuai Memorila Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kyoko AraiDepartment of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Satoshi MurakamiDiagnostic Division, Abbott Japan LLC, Tokyo, Japan.
Takao KamaiDepartment of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Dokkyo Medical University · JPAbbott (Japan) · JPSaiseikai Utsunomiya hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging data suggested that liquid biopsy such as detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free tumor DNA analysis augments the management of patients with urothelial cancer (UC). We presented our pilot experience of liquid biopsy using the Ion Torrent platform to detect CTCs and genomic alterations in UC. Materials and methods: Blood or urine samples from 16 patients were subjected to CTC and plasma/urine cell-free tumor DNA isolation for next generation sequencing (NGS) using the Ion S5 system to detect mutations among 50 oncogenes on the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel. Results: The Ion Torrent platform detected a higher number of CTCs than those in previous studies using the CellSearch Conclusions: The Ion Torrent platform efficiently detected CTCs compared with previous reports. NGS with the present system also allowed for detection of gene alterations which are likely to be therapeutic targets and provided an attractive tool to guide personalized therapy for patients with advanced UC.

Indexed as

Cell-free DNACell-free tumor DNACirculating tumor cellNext generation sequencingUrothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID36570364
PMCPMC9782328
OpenAlexW4214893071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.