Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570166›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Postbiotics: The concept and their use in healthy populations.

Gabriel Vinderola, Mary Ellen Sanders, Seppo Salminen, Hania Szajewska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of the Safety and Impact of Heat-TreatedJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Beyond Probiotics: Postbiotics for Healthy Aquaculture.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Gut microbiota in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Comparison of Viable and Heat-InactivatedFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriel VinderolaInstituto de Lactología Industrial (CONICET-UNL), Faculty of Chemical Engineering, National University of Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Mary Ellen SandersInternational Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics, Centennial, CO, United States.
Seppo SalminenFunctional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Hania SzajewskaDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLNational University of the Littoral · ARUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term postbiotic was recently defined by an panel of scientists convened by the International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics as "a

Indexed as

clinical studiesdefinitionshealthy populationmicrobiomepostbiotics

Identifiers

PMID36570166
PMCPMC9780264
OpenAlexW4311947928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.