ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill is an effective nutrition risk screening tool in severely burned patients, compared with Nutrition Risk Screening 2002.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of the nutritional screening tools in predicting clinical outcomes among older adults with hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Interruptions of enteral nutrition in intensive care units: mechanisms, clinical impacts, and precision nursing interventions-a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- [The evaluation value of mNUTRIC and NRS-2002 scores in assessing nutritional status and clinical outcomes in patients with end-stage liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Bayesian Analysis of Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) Score for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Nutritional Optimization of the Surgical Patient: A Narrative Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Review
- Modified NUTRIC Score as a Predictor of All-cause Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Application of metabolic phase-specific modified nutrition risk in critically ill score: a prospective observational study in critically ill patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the value of Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC) and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) in the prognosis of severely burned patients. Methods: The retrospective cohort study used medical data of severely burned patients admitted to the burn center of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between January 2015 and September 2021. Demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory nutritional indicators, mNUTRIC score and NRS2002 score were collected and analyzed in evaluation the value of two nutrition risk screening tools. Spearman correlation analysis was carried out to show the correlation between variables. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the ability of mNUTRIC and NRS2002 to predict mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify risk factors for 28-day mortality of severely burned patients. Results: A total of 429 adult patients with burn area larger than 30% total body surface area (TBSA) were included in this study. Incidence of nutrition risk was detected in 52.21% by mNUTRIC and 20.51% by NRS2002. However, mNUTRIC was superior to NRS2002 in predicting 28-day mortality (area under ROC curve: 0.795 vs. 0.726). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high mNUTRIC [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.265, 95% CI = 1.469-12.380, Conclusion: The present study illustrated the effectiveness of mNUTRIC as nutrition risk screening tool among severely burned patients. Early identification of nutrition risk may help to maximize benefits of nutritional therapy by providing more aggressive nutritional therapy for patients at nutrition risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.