ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
The association of dietary resistance starch intake with all-cause and cause-specific mortality.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of the skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio with metabolically healthy obesity and metabolically unhealthy non-obesity: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2011-2018.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Resistant Starch-Encapsulated Probiotics Attenuate Colorectal Cancer Cachexia and 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Microbial Dysbiosis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Associations of starchy and non-starchy vegetables with risk of metabolic syndrome: evidence from the NHANES 1999-2018.Nutrition & metabolism · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several studies have estimated daily intake of resistant starch (RS), but no studies have investigated the relationship of RS intake with mortality. Objective: We aimed to examine associations between RS intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Methods: Data from US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018 with 24-h dietary recall data was used in current study. The main exposure in this study was RS intake, and the main outcome was the mortality status of participants until December 31, 2019. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and all-cause mortality associated with RS intake. Results: A total of 42,586 US adults [mean (SD) age, 46.91 (16.88) years; 22,328 (52.43%) female] were included in the present analysis. During the 454,252 person-years of follow-up, 7,043 all-cause deaths occurred, including 1,809 deaths from CVD and 1,574 deaths from cancer. The multivariable-adjusted HRs for CVD, cancer, and all-cause mortality per quintile increase in RS intake were 1 (95%CI, 0.97-1.04), 0.96 (95%CI, 0.93-1), and 0.96 (95%CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively. The associations remained similar in the subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Higher RS intake is significantly associated with lower cancer and all-cause mortality, but not significantly with CVD mortality. Future studies focusing on other populations with different food sources of RS and RS subtypes are needed to access the dose-response relationship and to improve global dietary recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.