Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36570121›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Ultra-processed food consumption and associations with biomarkers of nutrition and inflammation in pregnancy: The Norwegian Environmental Biobank.

Pieta Tasnim Kelsey, Eleni Papadopoulou, Tiril Cecilie Borge, Cecilie Dahl, Anne Lise Brantsæter, Iris Erlund, Helle Margrete Meltzer, Line Småstuen Haug, Ida Henriette Caspersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pieta Tasnim KelseyDivision of Climate and Environmental Health, Department of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Eleni PapadopoulouGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Tiril Cecilie BorgeCluster for Reviews and Health Technology Assessments, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Cecilie DahlDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Lise BrantsæterDivision of Climate and Environmental Health, Department of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Iris ErlundDepartment of Government Services, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Helle Margrete MeltzerDivision of Climate and Environmental Health, Department of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Line Småstuen HaugDivision of Climate and Environmental Health, Department of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ida Henriette CaspersenCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A high consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is often associated with low nutritional quality, but data on associations with biomarkers are scarce. We aimed to explore associations between UPF intake, diet quality, and concentrations of biomarkers of nutrition and inflammation measured in mid-pregnancy. Methods: This cross-sectional study included Results: Ultra-processed food intake was positively associated with biomarker concentrations of vitamin E (γ-tocopherol), creatinine, K, and Na [βs: 5.6 to 17% increase in biomarker concentration per interquartile range (IQR) increase in UPF intake] and negatively associated with carotenoids (α-carotene, β-carotene, γ-carotene, α-cryptoxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, lycopene), vitamin A, Mo, and Se (βs: -2.1 to -18%). Inversely, high diet quality (i.e., the DQI) was positively associated with concentrations of carotenoids, vitamins [vitamin A (retinol) and D (25-OH-D)], and Se (β: 1.5 to 25%) and negatively associated with vitamin E (γ-tocopherol), creatinine, and Na (β: -4.8 to -8.3%). A weak, positive association was found between UPF and CRP (β: 5.4%, 95% CI 0.12-11%). Conclusion: High UPF intake was associated with reduced concentrations of nutrition biomarkers in mid-pregnancy. Associations in the opposite direction were found with high adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines, suggesting that the two dietary scoring systems capture diet quality in a mirrored manner in this population.

Indexed as

carotenoidsC-reactive proteinessential elementsFather and Child Cohort Studyferritinpregnancythe Norwegian Mothervitamins

Identifiers

PMID36570121
PMCPMC9772468
OpenAlexW4311849728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.