ArticleACS bio & med chem Au2022
Substrate Specificity and Kinetics of RNA Hydrolysis by SARS-CoV-2 NSP10/14 Exonuclease.
Article in ACS bio & med chem Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Slow PPThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- 1'-Cyanocytidine-5'-isobutyryl is a potent SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor in culture and infected Syrian hamsters.Science advances · 2025Article
- Adenosine modifications impede SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA transcription.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19, continues to evolve resistance to vaccines and existing antiviral therapies at an alarming rate, increasing the need for new direct-acting antiviral drugs. Despite significant advances in our fundamental understanding of the kinetics and mechanism of viral RNA replication, there are still open questions regarding how the proofreading exonuclease (NSP10/NSP14 complex) contributes to replication fidelity and resistance to nucleoside analogs. Through single turnover kinetic analysis, we show that the preferred substrate for the exonuclease is double-stranded RNA without any mismatches. Double-stranded RNA containing a 3'-terminal remdesivir was hydrolyzed at a rate similar to a correctly base-paired cognate nucleotide. Surprisingly, single-stranded RNA or duplex RNA containing a 3'-terminal mismatch was hydrolyzed at rates 125- and 45-fold slower, respectively, compared to the correctly base-paired double-stranded RNA. These results define the substrate specificity and rate of removal of remdesivir for the exonuclease and outline rigorous kinetic assays that could help in finding next-generation exonuclease inhibitors or nucleoside analogs that are able to evade excision. These results also raise important questions about the role of the polymerase/exonuclease complex in proofreading during viral replication. Addressing these questions through rigorous kinetic analysis will facilitate the search for desperately needed antiviral drugs to combat COVID-19.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.