The effect of conventional and sustainable agricultural management practices on carbon and water fluxes in a Mexican semi-arid region.

Gabriela Guillen-Cruz, Roberto Torres-Arreola, Zulia Sanchez-Mejia, Dulce Flores-Renteria

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriela Guillen-Cruz *Departamento Sustentabilidad de los Recursos Naturales y Energía, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Unidad Saltillo, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, Mexico.

Roberto Torres-Arreola *Departamento Sustentabilidad de los Recursos Naturales y Energía, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Unidad Saltillo, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, Mexico.

Zulia Sanchez-MejiaDepartamento de Ciencias del Agua y Medio Ambiente, Instituto Tecnologico de Sonora, Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Mexico.

Dulce Flores-RenteriaConacyt-Sustentabilidad de los Recursos Naturales y Energía, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Unidad Saltillo, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, Mexico.

Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXSonora Institute of Technology · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Agriculture is essential for food security. However, conventional agriculture alters the water and carbon cycle and soil properties. We investigated the effect of conventional management (CM) and sustainable management (SM) on the carbon and water cycle in crops of nopal (Np) and wheat (Wh). Methods: A micrometeorological eddy covariance tower was installed to measure water use through evapotranspiration (ET) and the net exchange of CO Results: The results showed that both agricultural managements influenced the carbon flux of the ecosystem, with a lower GPP and Reco in the nopal field (1.85 and 0.99 mmol C m

Indexed as

EcosystemWaterAgricultureCarbonCrops, AgriculturalSoilTriticumCarbonSoilWaterEcosystem respirationEddy covarianceGross primary productivityMinimum tillageWater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID36570005

DOI10.7717/peerj.14542

PMCPMC9784333

OpenAlexW4311958397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.