ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Integrative analysis indicates the prognostic value of circadian rhythm disruption in liver cancer: Potential for therapeutic targeting.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circadian disruption exacerbates MASH by reducingiScience · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis and therapeutic implications of prognostic value of circadian rhythm genes in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics in cancer immunotherapy: the interplay between circadian rhythms, tumor microenvironment, and immune checkpoint blockade.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Review
- The Biological Clock of Liver Metabolism in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Progression to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Chronobiology of Cancers in the Liver and Gut.Cancers · 2024Review
- Circadian rhythm-associated lncRNA RP11-414H17.5 as a key therapeutic target in osteosarcoma affects the tumor immune microenvironment and enhances malignancy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circadian rhythms regulate various biological processes, such as cell division and metabolism. Circadian rhythm disruption (CRD) is often associated with malignant tumor progression and poor prognosis. However, the effect of CRD on liver cancer prognosis has not been systematically analyzed or fully elucidated. Here, we developed a method to quantify and assess intratumoral CRD in a single-cell transcriptomic analysis of liver cancer and systematically analyzed the role of CRD in tumor progression and prognosis. Furthermore, a LASSO-Cox regression model based on 14 CRD genes was used to predict overall patient survival across multiple datasets. We found that malignant cells with high CRD scores were enriched in specific metabolic pathways, such as fatty acid metabolism and the trichloroacetic acid cycle. Intercellular communication analysis suggested that CRD regulates chemokine-mediated interactions. With the bulk transcriptomic datasets, we determined that LiverCRD scores were significantly correlated with macrophage infiltration levels and could guide targeted immunotherapy and chemotherapy strategies. In addition, LiverCRD is also associated with the mutational landscape-for example, TP53 mutation frequency was higher in high-CRD samples. Finally, the 14-gene-based LASSO-Cox regression model could accurately predict overall patient survival across datasets. In conclusion, Our proposed analysis reflects the relationship between CRD and the immune environment in liver cancer, suggesting that CRD may serve as a potential prognostic indicator. Our results may help guide targeted anti-tumor strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.