Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569844›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Exploring biomarkers for prognosis and neoadjuvant chemosensitivity in rectal cancer: Multi-omics and ctDNA sequencing collaboration.

Xiu-Feng Jiang, Bo-Miao Zhang, Fen-Qi Du, Jun-Nan Guo, Dan Wang, Yi-En Li, Shen-Hui Deng, Bin-Bin Cui, Yan-Long Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiu-Feng JiangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Bo-Miao ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Fen-Qi DuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Jun-Nan GuoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Dan WangDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar, China.
Yi-En LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Shen-Hui DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Bin-Bin CuiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Yan-Long LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CNQiqihar Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to identified the key genes and sequencing metrics for predicting prognosis and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in rectal cancer (RC) based on genomic DNA sequencing in samples with different origin and multi-omics association database. Methods: We collected 16 RC patients and obtained DNA sequencing data from cancer tissues and plasma cell-free DNA before and after nCT. Various gene variations were analyzed, including single nucleotide variants (SNV), copy number variation (CNV), tumor mutation burden (TMB), copy number instability (CNI) and mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH). We also identified genes by which CNV level can differentiate the response to nCT. The Cancer Genome Atlas database and the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium database were used to further evaluate the specific role of therapeutic relevant genes and screen out the key genes in multi-omics levels. After the intersection of the screened genes from differential expression analysis, survival analysis and principal components analysis dimensionality reduction cluster analysis, the key genes were finally identified. Results: The genes CNV level of principal component genes in baseline blood and cancer tissues could significantly distinguish the two groups of patients. The CNV of HSP90AA1, EGFR, SRC, MTOR, etc. were relatively gained in the better group compared with the poor group in baseline blood. The CNI and TMB was significantly different between the two groups. The increased expression of HSP90AA1, EGFR, and SRC was associated with increased sensitivity to multiple chemotherapeutic drugs. The nCT predictive score obtained by therapeutic relevant genes could be a potential prognostic indicator, and the combination with TMB could further refine prognostic prediction for patients. After a series of analysis in multi-omics association database, EGFR and HSP90AA1 with significant differences in multiple aspects were identified as the key predictive genes related to prognosis and the sensitivity of nCT. Discussion: This work revealed that effective combined application and analysis in multi-omics data are critical to search for predictive biomarkers. The key genes EGFR and HSP90AA1 could serve as an effective biomarker to predict prognose and neoadjuvant chemosensitivity.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsErbB ReceptorsHumansMultiomicsPrognosisProteomicsBiomarkers, TumorErbB Receptorscell-free DNAgenomic sequencingmulti-omicsneoadjuvant chemotherapyprognosisrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36569844
PMCPMC9780298
OpenAlexW4311947669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.