ArticleCureus2022
Traumatic Optic Neuropathy: Analysis of Demographic and Clinical Parameters Over Three Years in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Treatment options for traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) are limited and the role of steroids in the treatment of TON is still controversial. Hence this study was planned to highlight the role of steroids in the treatment of TON. Purpose The study aims to highlight the epidemiological and clinical characteristics, as well as the role of steroids, in TON cases seen during a three-year period at a tertiary care center in India. Methods This was a retrospective study that reviewed records of all cases of TON between January 2018 to January 2020. Results Twenty-three cases of TON were seen representing 1.26% cases of head injuries. The median age was 18 years. One patient (4.34%) had bilateral TON and 18 patients (78.26%) were referred from accident and trauma care. None of the patients presented directly to an ophthalmologist. The most common cause of injury was automobile accident (69.56%). Visual acuity at presentation was 20/80-20/100 in six (26.08%) cases. Fifteen (65.4%) patients had associated closed globe injury. Seven (30.43%) patients had ocular adnexal involvement and 10 (43.47%) patients had orbital fractures. Seventeen (73.91%) received steroid treatment and six of these patients showed visual improvement. Conclusions The study showed that there was no significant association between presenting visual acuity and treatment. The presence of significant ocular injury and orbital injury increased the likelihood of treatment. There was no difference between the treated and untreated groups with respect to final visual acuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.