Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569626›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Baseline brain and behavioral factors distinguish adolescent substance initiators and non-initiators at follow-up.

Goldie A McQuaid, Valerie L Darcey, Amanda E Patterson, Emma Jane Rose, Ashley S VanMeter, Diana H Fishbein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Goldie A McQuaidDepartment of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Valerie L DarceyCenter for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Amanda E PattersonCenter for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Emma Jane RoseDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Ashley S VanMeterCenter for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Diana H FishbeinFrank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

NEUROIMAGING COREP30HD040677 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCCARTER, ROBERT JAMES · 2001 to 2015
$15.9M
Neurobehavioral Evaluation CoreP50HD105328 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WILLIAM Davis GAILLARD · 2021 to 2026
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD040677NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Earlier substance use (SU) initiation is associated with greater risk for the development of SU disorders (SUDs), while delays in SU initiation are associated with a diminished risk for SUDs. Thus, identifying brain and behavioral factors that are markers of enhanced risk for earlier SU has major public health import. Heightened reward-sensitivity and risk-taking are two factors that confer risk for earlier SU. Materials and methods: We characterized neural and behavioral factors associated with reward-sensitivity and risk-taking in substance-naïve adolescents ( Results: While SI and SN youth showed similar task-based risk-taking behavior, SI youth showed more variable patterns of activation in left insular cortex during high-risk selections, and left anterior cingulate cortex in response to rewarded outcomes. Groups displayed similar discounting behavior. SI participants scored higher on the DUSI-R and the BAS sub-scale. Conclusion: Activation patterns in the insula and anterior cingulate cortex may serve as a biomarker for earlier SU initiation. Importantly, these brain regions are implicated in the development and experience of SUDs, suggesting differences in these regions prior to substance exposure.

Indexed as

adolescenceanterior cingulate (ACC)decision makinginsularewardrisk-takingsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID36569626
PMCPMC9780121
OpenAlexW4311875344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.