Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569561›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2022

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk in Women Exposed to Blue Light from Digital Screens.

Seyed Ali Reza Mortazavi, Sedigheh Tahmasebi, Hossein Parsaei, Abdorasoul Taleie, Mehdi Faraz, Abbas Rezaianzadeh, Atefeh Zamani, Ali Zamani, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones and the risk of breast cancer: A multicenter case-control study with an additional suspected comparison group.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seyed Ali Reza MortazaviMD, Student research committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sedigheh TahmasebiMD, Breast Cancer Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hossein ParsaeiPhD, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abdorasoul TaleieMD, Breast Cancer Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehdi FarazMSc, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abbas RezaianzadehPhD, Department of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Atefeh ZamaniPhD, Department of Statistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali ZamaniPhD, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad Javad MortazaviPhD, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, there is a growing global concern over rapidly increasing screen time (smartphones, tablets, and computers). An accumulating body of evidence indicates that prolonged exposure to short-wavelength visible light (blue component) emitted from digital screens may cause cancer. The application of machine learning (ML) methods has significantly improved the accuracy of predictions in fields such as cancer susceptibility, recurrence, and survival. Objective: To develop an ML model for predicting the risk of breast cancer in women via several parameters related to exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Material and Methods: In this analytical study, three ML models Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN) were used to analyze data collected from 603 cases, including 309 breast cancer cases and 294 gender and age-matched controls. Standard face-to-face interviews were performed using a standard questionnaire for data collection. Results: The examined models RF, SVM, and MLPNN performed well for correctly classifying cases with breast cancer and the healthy ones (mean sensitivity> 97.2%, mean specificity >96.4%, and average accuracy >97.1%). Conclusion: Machine learning models can be used to effectively predict the risk of breast cancer via the history of exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation (including blue light and screen time issues) parameters. The performance of the developed methods is encouraging; nevertheless, further investigation is required to confirm that machine learning techniques can diagnose breast cancer with relatively high accuracies automatically.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBlue LightBreast CancerCircadian ClocksDigital ScreensPrognosis PredictionScreen TimeSmartphoneVisible Light

Identifiers

PMID36569561
PMCPMC9759638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.