Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569507›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2023

Female sexual function in bladder cancer: A review of the evidence.

Rebecca Martin, Tessa Renouf, Jeannie Rigby, Shaista Hafeez, Ramesh Thurairaja, Pardeep Kumar, Susanne Cruickshank, Mieke Van-Hemelrijck

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rebecca MartinThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-1327
Tessa RenoufThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Jeannie RigbyAction Bladder Cancer Tetbury UK.
Shaista HafeezThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Ramesh ThurairajaUrology Department, Guys & St Thomas' NHS FT London UK.
Pardeep KumarThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Susanne CruickshankThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-4739
Mieke Van-HemelrijckTOUR team Kings College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-0858
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBAction Cancer · GBGuy's Hospital · GBKing's College - North Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bladder cancer (BC) treatments are known to be invasive; nevertheless, research into the long-term effects is limited and in the context of sexual function often male focussed. Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) has been reported in up to 75% of female patients. This systematic scoping review examines the literature on sexual consequences of BC in female patients. Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the evidence on female sexual function in BC to identify areas of unmet need and research priorities. Evidence Acquisition: We performed a critical review of PubMed, PsychMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in March 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Evidence Synthesis: There was an inconsistent use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), with commonly used PROMs having a narrow symptom focus. However, common symptoms emerged: loss of desire, orgasmic disorders, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, difficult intromission, reduced clitoral sensation, psychological concerns related to diagnosis, fear of contamination and body image. Sexual activity was reduced in most groups, despite women expressing a motivation to retain sexual function. The degree of symptom distress associated with FSD is underreported. Evidence emerged regarding a gap for women in clinician counselling and follow-up. Conclusions: The patient's perspective of FSD in BC patients is poorly understood and under-addressed in clinical practice. There have been very few qualitative studies of FSD in BC. Any intervention designed to address the problem must start with greater understanding of both the patients' and clinicians' perspective. Lay Summary: We examined the evidence on sexual consequences of BC in women. It is apparent that despite common themes of sexual dysfunction emerging, the problem is poorly understood and addressed in clinical practice.

Indexed as

bladder cancerconsequences of cancercystectomyfemale sexual functionintravesicalliving with and beyond cancernon‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancerradiotherapysexual functionsexual recovery

Identifiers

PMID36569507
PMCPMC9766865
OpenAlexW4297174440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.