ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Preclinical Study of Radiation on Fat Flap Regeneration under Tissue-engineering Chamber: Potential Consequences for Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- State of Research on Tissue Engineering with 3D Printing for Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Engineering 3D-Printed Bioresorbable Scaffold to Improve Non-Vascularized Fat Grafting: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Gluteal Propeller Perforator Flaps: A Paradigm Shift in Abdominoperineal Amputation Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of a tissue-engineering chamber (TEC) for growth of fat flap is a promising approach for breast reconstruction. Here, we evaluated in a preclinical model the effects of radiation on adipose tissue growth either before or after 3D-printed bioresorbable TEC implantation. Methods: Twenty-eight female Wistar rats were distributed into three groups: TEC implantation as nonirradiated controls (G1), TEC insertion followed by irradiation 3 weeks later (G2), and irradiation 6 weeks before TEC insertion (G3). G2 and G3 received 33.3 Gy in nine sessions of 3.7 Gy. Growth of the fat flap was monitored via magnetic resonance imaging. At 6 months after implantation, fat flaps and TECs were harvested for analysis. Results: Irradiation did not alter the physicochemical features of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based TECs. Compared with G1, fat flap growth was significantly reduced by 1.6 times in irradiated G2 and G3 conditions. In G2 and G3, fat flaps consisted of mature viable adipocytes sustained by CD31+ vascular cells. However, 37% (3 of 8) of the G2 irradiated adipose tissues presented a disorganized architecture invaded by connective tissues with inflammatory CD68 + cells, and the presence of fibrosis was observed. Conclusions: Overall, this preclinical study does not reveal any major obstacle to the use of TEC in a radiotherapy context. Although irradiation reduces the growth of fat flap under the TEC by reducing adipogenesis and inducing inconsistent fibrosis, it does not impact flap survival and vascularization. These elements must be taken into account if radiotherapy is proposed before or after TEC-based breast reconstruction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.