ArticleDisease markers2022
Prognostic Biomarkers Identification in Esophageal Cancer Based on WGCNA and Single-Cell Analysis.
Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell multi-omics in the study of digestive system cancers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Analysis of Prospective Genetic Indicators for Prenatal Exposure to Arsenic in Newborn Cord Blood of Using Machine Learning.Biological trace element research · 2024Article
- Identification of a Prognostic Model Based on NK Cell-Related Genes in Multiple Myeloma Using Single-Cell and Transcriptomic Data Analysis.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2024Article
- Matrix Metalloproteinase 11 Promotes Migration and Invasion of Colorectal Cancer by Elevating Slug Protein.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Dysregulation of genes plays an important role in cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic biomarkers in esophageal cancer based on comprehensive bioinformatics analysis including WGCNA and single cell analysis. Methods: RNA sequencing data of esophageal cancer was downloaded from GSE75241 dataset in the GEO database. We also selected esophageal cancer patients from public databases (Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)). WGCNA was used to construct a scale-free coexpression network of genes. Multifactor Cox analysis model was constructed as the prognostic model in esophageal cancer. Furthermore, single-cell gene analysis was used to discover the mechanism of hub genes in esophageal cancer. Results: WGCNA discovered 182 genes for further analysis. Among 182 genes, four genes including ANGPT2, VCAN, MS4A4A, and FOS had significant prognostic value in esophageal cancer. In single cell analysis, seven types of cells subsets were distinguished including T cells, B cells, NK cells, monocytes, macrophages, DCs, neutrophils. The expression of four hub genes (ANGPT2, VCAN, MS4A4A, and FOS) in inflammatory cell subsets was evaluated, respectively. Hub genes were correlated with inflammatory cells in esophageal cancer. In addition, the subgroups of specific inflammatory cells such as macrophages, monocytes, and DCs were analyzed to identify the function of hub genes, either. Hub genes were correlated with differentiation of inflammatory cells including monocytes, macrophages, and DCs in tumor environment. Conclusions: We identified specific hub genes correlated with prognosis of esophageal cancer. These hub genes play critical roles by regulating inflammatory cells status in esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.