ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022
Blood Mucorales PCR to track down
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Polymerase Chain Reaction in Blood and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Samples for Mucormycosis: A Bayesian Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis.Mycopathologia · 2025Pooled it
- A step toward defining optimal liposomal amphotericin B treatment duration in pulmonary mucormycosis: results from emulated trials.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Novel diagnostic approaches and therapeutic management of mucormycosis: insights from a retrospective monocentric cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evidence of Possible Mucormycosis Coinfection, Detected by Plasma Mucorales PCR, in Patients with Proven or Probable Aspergillosis.Infection & chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Invasive Trichoderma longibrachiatum breakthrough infection in a hematology patient.Medical mycology case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- A global perspective of the changing epidemiology of invasive fungal disease and real-world experience with the use of isavuconazole.Medical mycology · 2024Review
- High-Risk Neutropenic Fever and Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Plasma for Diagnosis of COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Serum Mucorales PCR can precede the final diagnosis of invasive mucormycosis by several days or weeks and could therefore be useful as a non-invasive screening tool. Methods: We assessed the performance of a commercial Mucorales PCR assay (MucorGenius®, PathoNostics, Maastricht, The Netherlands) on prospectively collected banked sera from hematology patients at risk for invasive mould infections. We evaluated if there is an underestimated incidence of missed Mucorales co-infections in patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA). We tested Mucorales PCR on the sera of all patients with a diagnosis of at least possible IA (EORTC-MSGERC consensus criteria) before the start of any antifungal therapy, and in a control group of similar high-risk hematology patients without IA (in a 1:4 ratio). When a positive Mucorales PCR was observed, at least 5 serum samples taken before and after the positive one were selected. Results: Mucorales PCR was performed in 46 diagnostic serum samples of cases and in 184 controls. Serum Mucorales PCR was positive in 4 cases of IA (8.7%; 12.9% of probable cases) and in 1 control case (0.5%) (p=0.0061, OR=17.43 (1.90-159.96). Post-mortem cultures of the positive control became positive for Rhizopus arrhizus. Mortality of IA cases with and without a positive Mucorales PCR was not significantly different. Only in the PCR positive control case, serial serum samples before and after the diagnostic sample were also positive. Discussion: It is not entirely clear what a positive Mucorales PCR in these cases implies since the 4 Mucorales PCR positive cases were treated with antifungals with activity against Mucorales. In addition, PCR was positive only once. This study does not provide enough evidence to implement Mucorales PCR screening. However, our findings emphasize once more the importance of considering the possibility of dual mould infections, even in patients with a positive galactomannan detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.