ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Exploratory analysis of radiomic as prognostic biomarkers in
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in assessing treatment response after chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- An exploratory assessment of early and delta PET radiomic features for outcome prediction in locally advanced cervical cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Pre-Treatment PET Radiomics for Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in assisting treatment of gynecologic tumors: a systematic review.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Review
- [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system for stage IIIC cervical cancer by determining the metabolic and radiomic heterogeneity of primary tumors based onAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Baseline and early response 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI for prediction of radiotherapy outcome in uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective single-center observational cohort study.EJNMMI reports · 2024Article
- Methodological evaluation of original articles on radiomics and machine learning for outcome prediction based on positron emission tomography (PET).Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( Methods: Longitudinal and retrospective study that evaluated 50 patients with cervical epidermoid carcinoma (clinical stage IB2 to IVA according to FIGO). Segmentation of the 18F-FDG PET/CT tumors was performed using the LIFEx software, generating the radiomic features. We used the Mann-Whitney test to select radiomic features associated with the clinical outcome (death), excluding the features highly correlated with each other with Spearman correlation. Subsequently, ROC curves and a Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed. A Results: The median follow-up was 23.5 months and longer than 24 months in all surviving patients. Independent predictors for OS were found-SUVpeak with an AUC of 0.74, sensitivity of 77.8%, and specificity of 72.7% ( Conclusion: By radiomic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.