Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569123›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal in outpatient surgeries: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and associated healthcare cost in an academic center.

Juan Fiorda Diaz, Marco Echeverria-Villalobos, Alan Esparza Gutierrez, Olufunke Dada, Nicoleta Stoicea, Wiebke Ackermann, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Jarrett Heard, Alberto Uribe, Sergio D Bergese

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03579589 (The Effect of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in Outpatient Surgeries - An Evaluation of Clinical and Associated Health Care Cost), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03579589 phase1completednot on this map

The Effect of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in Outpatient Surgeries - An Evaluation of Clinical and Associated Health Care Cost

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsNeuromuscular BlockadeArmsSugammadex vs Neostigmine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Pharmacological assessment of drugs retained in the 1Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juan Fiorda DiazDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Marco Echeverria-VillalobosDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Alan Esparza GutierrezCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Olufunke DadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States.
Nicoleta StoiceaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Wiebke AckermannDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Mahmoud Abdel-RasoulDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Jarrett HeardDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Alberto UribeDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Sergio D BergeseDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neuromuscular blockade is an essential component of the general anesthesia as it allows for a better airway management and optimal surgical conditions. Despite significant reductions in extubation and OR readiness-for-discharge times have been associated with the use of sugammadex, the cost-effectiveness of this drug remains controversial. We aimed to compare the time to reach a train-of-four (TOF) response of ≥0.9 and operating room readiness for discharge in patients who received sugammadex for moderate neuromuscular blockade reversal when compared to neostigmine during outpatient surgeries under general anesthesia. Potential reduction in time for OR discharge readiness as a result of sugammadex use may compensate for the existing cost-gap between sugammadex and neostigmine. Methods: We conducted a single-center, randomized, double arm, open-label, prospective clinical trial involving adult patients undergoing outpatient surgeries under general anesthesia. Eligible subjects were randomized (1:1 ratio) into two groups to receive either sugammadex (Groups S), or neostigmine/glycopyrrolate (Group N) at the time of neuromuscular blockade reversal. The primary outcome was the time to reverse moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade (TOF ratio ≥0.9) in both groups. In addition, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)/hospital length of stay (LOS) and perioperative costs were compared among groups as secondary outcomes. Results: Thirty-seven subjects were included in our statistical analysis (Group S= 18 subjects and Group N= 19 subjects). The median time to reach a TOF ratio ≥0.9 was significantly reduced in Group S when compared to Group N (180 versus 540 seconds; Discussion: Sugammadex use was associated with a significantly faster moderate neuromuscular blockade reversal. We found no evidence of increased perioperative costs associated with the use of sugammadex in patients undergoing outpatient surgeries in our academic institution. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/] identifier number [NCT03579589].

Indexed as

cost-benefit analysisneostigmineneuromuscular blockadeneuromuscular blocking agentsrocuroniumsugammadex

Identifiers

PMID36569123
PMCPMC9772266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.