ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal in outpatient surgeries: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and associated healthcare cost in an academic center.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03579589 (The Effect of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in Outpatient Surgeries - An Evaluation of Clinical and Associated Health Care Cost), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in Outpatient Surgeries - An Evaluation of Clinical and Associated Health Care Cost
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neostigmine versus sugammadex on outpatient recovery among obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Pharmacological assessment of drugs retained in the 1Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Effect of Reversal Agents on Postoperative Cognitive Disorders Following General Anesthesia in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In-depth exploration of sugammadex and novel neuromuscular blockade antagonists: a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Pediatric Anesthetic Management of a Patient With Warburg Micro Syndrome, a Rare Autosomal Recessive Genetic Disorder.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Effects of Sugammadex on the Coagulation Profile of Living Liver Donors Undergoing Hepatectomy: A Case-Control Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Sugammadex and urinary retention after hysterectomy: A propensity-matched cohort study.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Economic Impact of Postoperative Urinary Retention in the US Hospital Setting.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neuromuscular blockade is an essential component of the general anesthesia as it allows for a better airway management and optimal surgical conditions. Despite significant reductions in extubation and OR readiness-for-discharge times have been associated with the use of sugammadex, the cost-effectiveness of this drug remains controversial. We aimed to compare the time to reach a train-of-four (TOF) response of ≥0.9 and operating room readiness for discharge in patients who received sugammadex for moderate neuromuscular blockade reversal when compared to neostigmine during outpatient surgeries under general anesthesia. Potential reduction in time for OR discharge readiness as a result of sugammadex use may compensate for the existing cost-gap between sugammadex and neostigmine. Methods: We conducted a single-center, randomized, double arm, open-label, prospective clinical trial involving adult patients undergoing outpatient surgeries under general anesthesia. Eligible subjects were randomized (1:1 ratio) into two groups to receive either sugammadex (Groups S), or neostigmine/glycopyrrolate (Group N) at the time of neuromuscular blockade reversal. The primary outcome was the time to reverse moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade (TOF ratio ≥0.9) in both groups. In addition, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)/hospital length of stay (LOS) and perioperative costs were compared among groups as secondary outcomes. Results: Thirty-seven subjects were included in our statistical analysis (Group S= 18 subjects and Group N= 19 subjects). The median time to reach a TOF ratio ≥0.9 was significantly reduced in Group S when compared to Group N (180 versus 540 seconds; Discussion: Sugammadex use was associated with a significantly faster moderate neuromuscular blockade reversal. We found no evidence of increased perioperative costs associated with the use of sugammadex in patients undergoing outpatient surgeries in our academic institution. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/] identifier number [NCT03579589].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.