Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569091›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Diagnostic efficiency of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for suspected spinal tuberculosis in China: A multicenter prospective study.

Yuan Li, Xiao-Wei Yao, Liang Tang, Wei-Jie Dong, Ting-Long Lan, Jun Fan, Feng-Sheng Liu, Shi-Bing Qin

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing forFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Characterization of theAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Development and validation of a nomogram for differential diagnosis of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis in China: a multicenter retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Wei YaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Hebei Chest Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Liang TangDepartment of Orthopedics, Tianjin Haihe Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wei-Jie DongDepartment of Orthopedics, Hebei Chest Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Ting-Long LanDepartment of Orthopedics, Hebei Chest Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jun FanDepartment of Orthopedics, Hebei Chest Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Feng-Sheng LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Tianjin Haihe Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shi-Bing QinDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hospital of Hebei Province · CNCapital Medical University · CNTianjin haihe hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The pathogens of suspected spinal tuberculosis (TB) include TB and non-TB bacteria. A rapid and effective diagnostic method that can detect TB and non-TB pathogens simultaneously remains lacking. Here, we used metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to detect the pathogens in patients with suspected spinal TB. Methods: The enrolled patients with suspected spinal TB were regrouped three times into patients with spinal infection and controls, patients with spinal TB and controls, and patients with non-TB spinal infection and controls. We tested the three groups separately by using mNGS and conventional detection methods. Results: Ultimately, 100 patients were included in this study. Pathogens were detected in 82 patients. Among the 82 patients, 37 had TB and 45 were infected with other bacteria. In patients with spinal infection, the sensitivity of the mNGS assay was higher than that of culture and pathological examination ( Conclusion: Data presented here demonstrated that mNGS can detect TB and non-TB bacteria simultaneously, with high sensitivity, specificity and short detection time. Compared with conventional detection methods, mNGS is a more rapid and effective diagnostic tool for suspected spinal TB.

Indexed as

diagnosisinfectionmetagenomic next-generation sequencingspinetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36569091
PMCPMC9768024
OpenAlexW4311709662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.