Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569074›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

A review on the bioleaching of toxic metal(loid)s from contaminated soil: Insight into the mechanism of action and the role of influencing factors.

Emmanuel Konadu Sarkodie, Luhua Jiang, Kewei Li, Jiejie Yang, Ziwen Guo, Jiaxin Shi, Yan Deng, Hongwei Liu, Huidan Jiang, Yili Liang and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mosses in Urban Environments as Passive Biofilters and Organisms Impacted by Asbestos-Contaminated Habitats.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Do ferrous iron-oxidizing acidophiles (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emmanuel Konadu SarkodieSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Luhua JiangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Kewei LiSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jiejie YangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ziwen GuoSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jiaxin ShiSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yan DengSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hongwei LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Huidan JiangHunan Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha, China.
Yili LiangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Huaqun YinSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xueduan LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anthropogenic activities in agriculture, industrialization, mining, and metallurgy combined with the natural weathering of rocks, have led to severe contamination of soils by toxic metal(loid)s. In an attempt to remediate these polluted sites, a plethora of conventional approaches such as Solidification/Stabilization (S/S), soil washing, electrokinetic remediation, and chemical oxidation/reduction have been used for the immobilization and removal of toxic metal(loid)s in the soil. However, these conventional methods are associated with certain limitations. These limitations include high operational costs, high energy demands, post-waste disposal difficulties, and secondary pollution. Bioleaching has proven to be a promising alternative to these conventional approaches in removing toxic metal(loid)s from contaminated soil as it is cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and esthetically pleasing. The bioleaching process is influenced by factors including pH, temperature, oxygen, and carbon dioxide supply, as well as nutrients in the medium. It is crucial to monitor these parameters before and throughout the reaction since a change in any, for instance, pH during the reaction, can alter the microbial activity and, therefore, the rate of metal leaching. However, research on these influencing factors and recent innovations has brought significant progress in bioleaching over the years. This critical review, therefore, presents the current approaches to bioleaching and the mechanisms involved in removing toxic metal(loid)s from contaminated soil. We further examined and discussed the fundamental principles of various influencing factors that necessitate optimization in the bioleaching process. Additionally, the future perspectives on adding omics for bioleaching as an emerging technology are discussed.

Indexed as

bioleachingcontaminated soilinfluence factorsremediation mechanismtoxic metal(loid)s

Identifiers

PMID36569074
PMCPMC9767989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.