Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36569017›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Principle and progress of radical treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Xiao-Fei Zhang, Pei-Yi Liu, Shu-Juan Zhang, Kuai-Le Zhao, Wei-Xin Zhao

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiao-Fei ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Pei-Yi LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, School of Medicine Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200336, China.
Shu-Juan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Kashgar, Kashgar 844000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Kuai-Le ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Wei-Xin ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in the digestive system in China and the world. Most patients are diagnosed as locally advanced or advanced stage. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This study intends to summarize the evidence-based medical evidence of the treatment principle of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the selection of radiotherapy dose, the outline of radiotherapy target and the selection of chemotherapy scheme. As a result, the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is equivalent to that of surgery for the radical treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In the era of immunization, it is recommended to use involved field irradiation. Fluorouracil plus cisplatin regimen is the standard chemotherapy regimen. FOLFOX regimen and paclitaxel plus fluorouracil regimen are optional concurrent chemotherapy regimens. The toxic and side effects of different chemotherapy regimens are different, which can be selected according to the actual situation of patients.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaInvolving field irradiationRadical radiotherapy and chemotherapyRadical treatment

Identifiers

PMID36569017
PMCPMC9782941
OpenAlexW4311242319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.