ArticleF&S reports2022
Patient characteristics of contraception and sterilization selection at vaginal delivery.
Article in F&S reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contraception and sterilization selection at delivery among pregnant patients with malignancy.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine patient characteristics among those who selected the long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and surgical sterilization methods at vaginal delivery. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The National Inpatient Sample. Patients: A total of 8,013,785 vaginal deliveries from October 2016 to December 2019. Interventions: Exposure assignment per LARC (subdermal contraceptive implant [implants] or intrauterine device [IUD]) or surgical sterilization (bilateral salpingectomy [BS] or bilateral tubal ligation [BTL]) type. Main Outcome Measures: Utilization trends of LARC or surgical sterilization, assessed with linear segmented regression with log-transformation, and differences in patient characteristics per the exposure strata (implants vs. IUD in the LARC group and BS or BTL in the surgical sterilization group), assessed using the multivariate binary logistic regression model. Results: In a comparison between LARC and surgical sterilization, surgical sterilization use decreased from 1.90% to 1.55% (18.4% relative decrease), whereas LARC use increased from 0.35% to 1.02% (191% relative increase). In the LARC group, implant use (from 0.12% to 0.50%) increased more compared with IUD use (from 0.22% to 0.52%): relative increase, 317% vs. 136%. In the surgical sterilization group, BTL use decreased from 0.66% to 0.18% (72.7% relative decrease), whereas BS use was statistically unchanged (from 1.24% to 1.37%). In a multivariate analysis, recent year remained an independent characteristic for implant use in the LARC group and BS use in the surgical sterilization group. Moreover, in both LARC and surgical sterilization strata, procedure choices significantly differed on the basis of patient, pregnancy, hospital, and delivery factors. Conclusions: Immediate postpartum contraception choice has evolved in recent years in the United States with an increasing demand for the LARC methods with implants at the time of vaginal delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.