ArticleF&S reports2022
Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Have Similar Embryonic Preimplantation Genetic Testing Aneuploidy Rates and In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes to Infertility Patients.
Article in F&S reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-Mullerian Hormone As A Predictor Of Live Birth For Patients With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative analysis of cumulative live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus conventional in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a retrospective study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Analysis of pregnancy outcomes in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriage assisted by IVF/ICSI with or without PGT-A.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- A Prospective Study on Clinical Utility of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and Structural Rearrangement Under Advanced Medical Care B in Japan.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate aneuploidy rates and in vitro fertilization (IVF)/pregnancy outcomes for patients undergoing IVF and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with a recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) diagnosis compared to infertility diagnoses without RPL. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic fertility center. Patients: Of 372 patients undergoing IVF/PGT-A between January 2016-December 2018, 294 patients were included in the analysis: 56 patients with an RPL diagnosis and 238 with infertility diagnoses without RPL. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was the embryonic aneuploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization and blastulation rates, number of blastocysts biopsied, cycles without euploid blastocysts, and rates of pregnancy losses, clinical pregnancies, and live births after a euploid embryo transfer. Results: The cohort included 56 patients with RPL and 238 patients without RPL, including data from their first IVF cycle within the time period. Aneuploidy rates were similar between the groups, with a mean of 55% (±31%) in RPL and 54% (±34%) in non-RPL cycles. Similar rates persisted after controlling for age, ovarian reserve, and infertility diagnosis. Fertilization and blastulation rates, as well as cumulative clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth rates after the transfer of at least one euploid embryo were also similar between the two groups. Conclusions: These results suggest that IVF/PGT-A cycles from patients with an RPL diagnosis have similar IVF and pregnancy outcomes to those of patients with infertility without RPL. This research can help guide counseling for RPL patients considering IVF with PGT-A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.