Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568873›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

The response of litter decomposition to extreme drought modified by plant species, plant part, and soil depth in a temperate grassland.

Anikó Seres, György Kröel-Dulay, Judit Szakálas, Péter István Nagy, Gergely Boros, Gábor Ónodi, Miklós Kertész, Katalin Szitár, Andrea Mojzes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anikó SeresDepartment of Zoology and Ecology, Institute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.
György Kröel-DulayCentre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.
Judit SzakálasDepartment of Zoology and Ecology, Institute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.
Péter István NagyDepartment of Zoology and Ecology, Institute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.
Gergely BorosDepartment of Zoology and Ecology, Institute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation Szent István Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.
Gábor ÓnodiCentre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.
Miklós KertészCentre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.
Katalin Szitár'Lendület' Landscape and Conservation Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.
Andrea MojzesCentre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2171-403X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant litter decomposition is a key ecosystem process in carbon and nutrient cycling, and is heavily affected by changing climate. While the direct effects of drought on decomposition are widely studied, in order to better predict the overall drought effect, indirect effects associated with various drought-induced changes in ecosystems should also be quantified. We studied the effect of an extreme (5-month) experimental drought on decomposition, and if this effect varies with two dominant perennial grasses, plant parts (leaves vs. roots), and soil depths (0-5 cm vs. 10-15 cm) in a semi-arid temperate grassland. After 12 months, the average litter mass loss was 43.5% in the control plots, while only 25.7% in the drought plots. Overall, mass loss was greater for leaves (44.3%) compared to roots (24.9%), and for

Indexed as

climate changedominance shiftlitter qualityrooting depthroot‐to‐shoot ratio

Identifiers

PMID36568873
PMCPMC9772495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.