ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2022
The Outcome Predictors of the Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury; A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric road traffic accident - related head injury: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Ghana.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Potential Protective Effects of Naloxone in Traumatic Brain Injury Through JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Modulation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting Factors Associated with In-hospital Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Extracellular cold-inducible RNA-binding protein in CNS injury: molecular insights and therapeutic approaches.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To probe the factors associated with the outcomes of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients admitted to emergency department (ED). Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that data gathering was performed via census methods, retrospectively. During one year, all head injury's patients who admitted to the ED of a tertiary center in Tehran, Iran were included. Age, gender, mechanism of injury, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and injury severity score (ISS) on admission, presence of extra-cranial injuries, findings of brain computed tomography (CT), duration of hospitalization, and in hospital outcomes were recorded. Outcome's assessment for survivors was performed within a 6 months-period after discharge based on Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). The variables and outcomes' association were assessed. Results: Totally, 506 patients were evaluated with the mean age of 36.77±21.1 years that 411 (81.2%) were men. Follow up at 6-months post injury was feasible in 487 (96.2%) patients; 59 (11.7%) out of 506 eligible patients died. Logistic regression analysis showed the association between assessed variables and patients' outcome as follows: age>65 years (OR: 12.21; Conclusion: The findings of the current study distinguished some variables that were associated with the poor outcome of the patients with TBI. Therefore, TBI patients with any of these risk factors may need close continues monitoring, early ICU admission, and some other special extra care in ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.