Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568696›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR2021

Analysis of crisis communication by the Prime Minister of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Natalie Reyes Bernard, Abdul Basit, Ernesta Sofija, Hai Phung, Jessica Lee, Shannon Rutherford, Bernadette Sebar, Neil Harris, Dung Phung, Nicola Wiseman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Content Analysis of Official Public Health Communications in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Infodemic: Challenges and solutions in topic discovery and data process.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Public Health Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: The Role of the Morrison Government.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natalie Reyes BernardSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Abdul BasitSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Ernesta SofijaSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Hai PhungSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Jessica LeeSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Shannon RutherfordSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Bernadette SebarSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Neil HarrisSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Dung PhungSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.
Nicola WisemanSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leadership and communication capabilities of federal leaders during crises are imperative to support and guide citizens' behaviors and emotions. The following content analysis examines crisis communication delivered by the Australian Prime Minister (PM), Scott Morrison during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication delivered over seven months starting from the first reported case of COVID-19 in Australia, was analyzed through a process of coding to identify central organizing crisis communication frames and themes and measured against eleven main themes based on principles of Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) recommended by the WHO and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Transcripts were sourced from the PM's official website and 91 communiques were analyzed. Key epidemiological indicators and public health measures were reviewed over timeframe to examine changes in communication over the pandemic. Findings indicated that PM Morrison included many features of CERC within his official messaging. Our analysis revealed that the original framework was limited in its scope to encompass certain messages and thus the allocation of new frames,'public health and medical advice' and 'assuring and commending the public and institutions', allowed for a more thorough analysis of communication during a novel global health pandemic. The temporal analysis demonstrated that the government's policy and communication temporally followed case numbers and relative threat of the virus. This study has provided an in-depth review of CERC during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. New frames and themes for the current CERC framework are suggested which can be transferable to other crises in Australia and other countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19 leadership in crisisCrisis and emergency communication (CERC)Framing theoryRisk communicationScott morrison

Identifiers

PMID36568696
PMCPMC9766882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.