Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568687›Full record

ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2022

Preconcentration of Superbase Ionic Liquid from Aqueous Solution by Membrane Filtration.

Filipe H B Sosa, Pedro J Carvalho, João A P Coutinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filipe H B SosaCICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal.
Pedro J CarvalhoCICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-0006
João A P CoutinhoCICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-743X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain organic superbase ionic liquids (ILs) have shown good cellulose dissolution and fiber regeneration performance, allowing us to obtain high-quality textile fibers. However, there is a lack regarding the IL recovery from the spinning bath and its purification, which is essential for the economic viability of the process. Aiming to understand methods to separate ILs from water for reuse/recycle, the use of pressure-driven membrane processes to recycle ionic liquids from aqueous solution was investigated. The recovery of two superbase ILs, 7-methyl-1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-enium acetate, [mTBDH][OAc], and 5-methyl-1,5,7-triaza-bicyclo[4.3.0]non-6-enium acetate, [mTBNH][OAc], were studied using different types of membranes (microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis, RO). Additionally, pressure, IL concentration, temperature, and multicycle effect were evaluated. Significant retentions (>45%) were obtained for the nanofiltration and RO membranes (NF270-NF and BW30LE-RO). The increase in pressure and temperature resulted in an increase in volumetric flux and a decrease in IL retention. On the other hand, IL concentration decreased the volumetric flow and rejection. For the serial filtration tests, a three-fold ionic liquid concentration was achieved, for a maximum concentration of 14 wt % of the ionic liquid. The membrane filtration methodology proved to be an efficient technique for carrying out the preconcentration of the IL from dilute solutions.

Identifiers

PMID36568687
PMCPMC9777811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.