Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568681›Full record

ArticleEcological indicators2022

Skeletal growth capacity as a measure of coral species and community resilience.

William S Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological indicators, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reef structure of the Florida Reef Tract for the period 2005-2020.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William S FisherU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accretion and erosion of scleractinian (stony coral) carbonate skeletons determine whether a colony will increase or decrease in size with potential consequences for ecosystem processes, functions and services. The capacity for skeletal growth can be estimated by comparing a colony's rate of calcification with its rate of erosion. Calcification depends on the species-specific metabolic activity of living tissue, and erosion depends primarily on the availability and density of barren skeleton, those areas on the colony where polyps have died. Assessment of skeletal growth capacity requires data on calcification rates, erosion rates and both live and barren colony surface area. Rates of calcification and erosion are documented for many Caribbean species and others can be estimated from existing data. Three-dimensional surface area of colonies can be determined from data collected during demographic surveys, which identify species, measure dimensions, and estimate the proportion of live tissue on a colony. Data from demographic surveys conducted in the U.S. Virgin Islands are used to calculate the skeletal growth capacity (GC) as an indicator of coral species and community resilience. Scleractinia are the primary architects of coral reefs, and the gain or loss of skeletal framework is vitally important to reef ecosystem processes that lead to valued goods and services. Estimates of GC reflect stony coral resilience, which is the capacity to recover from disturbances by returning to previous physical and functional levels. GC can also provide insight to the effects of stressors such as ocean acidification, and can inform several management decisions, including restoration site selection and threatened species designation.

Indexed as

Coral reef frameworkCoral reef resilienceStony coral conditionStony coral erosionStony coral growth

Identifiers

PMID36568681
PMCPMC9769109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.