Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568652›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Technology and orthopaedic surgeons.

Raju Vaishya, Abid Haleem

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence-based orthopaedic perpetual design.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raju VaishyaDepartment of Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, 110076, India.
Abid HaleemDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 10025, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern and innovative technologies are rapidly penetrating the clinical practices of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The ones that have proved successful for clinical use are Additive Manufacturing/3D printing, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Smart sensors, and Orthobiologics. Industry 5.0 revolution has helped provide personalised treatment by integrating machines and human beings. In this special issue, we present a collection of excellent articles on these technologies.

Indexed as

3D printingAdditive manufacturingArtificial intelligenceBiomaterialsIndustry 5.0OrthobiologicsRobot

Identifiers

PMID36568652
PMCPMC9780058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.