Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568569›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2022

Reaching Consensus for Comprehensive Outcome Measurement After Urethral Stricture Surgery: Development of Study Protocol for Stricture-Fecta Criteria.

Guglielmo Mantica, Wesley Verla, Andrea Cocci, Mikołaj Frankiewicz, Jan Adamowicz, Felix Campos-Juanatey, Clemens M Rosenbaum, Marjan Waterloos, Luis A Kluth, Malte W Vetterlein and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Guglielmo ManticaIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Wesley VerlaDepartment of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Andrea CocciDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-6294
Mikołaj FrankiewiczDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Jan AdamowiczDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Felix Campos-JuanateyAndrology and Reconstructive Urology Unit, Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2231-5199
Clemens M RosenbaumDepartment of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Marjan WaterloosDepartment of Urology, Division of Reconstructive Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Luis A KluthDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Malte W VetterleinDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Trauma and Reconstructive Urology Working Party of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists
Ghent University Hospital · BEAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DEAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITGoethe University Frankfurt · DEGonabad University of Medical Sciences · IRMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESNicolaus Copernicus University · PLOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urethral stricture disease is a very heterogeneous condition where different urethral segments can be involved as a result of diverse etiologies which come with variable prognosis. The surgical management of urethral strictures, and in particular urethroplasties can result in very diverse outcomes on many levels and, currently, there is absolutely no consensus about what should and what should not be considered a "success" after urethral surgery. In the wake of well-established quality criteria in urologic oncology, such as tri- or pentafecta outcomes, and given the lack of agreement on meaningful outcomes after urethral surgery, we aim to introduce our study protocol as the first step of a multistep research endeavor to reach consensus on comprehensive urethroplasty outcomes within a novel conceptual framework: the "stricture-fecta criteria". The development of stricture-fecta will be based on a Delphi consensus involving some of worldwide most influencing reconstructive urologists.

Indexed as

pentafectaurethral stenosisurethral strictureurethroplastyurethrotomy

Identifiers

PMID36568569
PMCPMC9785114
OpenAlexW4311880384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.