Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568540›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, component network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

László Szapáry, Dániel Tornyos, Péter Kupó, Réka Lukács, Oumaima El Alaoui El Abdallaoui, András Komócsi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrated care management for patients following acute stroke: a systematic review.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ShSPI Inhibits Thrombosis Formation and Ischemic Stroke In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

László SzapáryDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Dániel TornyosDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter KupóDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Réka LukácsDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Oumaima El Alaoui El AbdallaouiDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
András KomócsiDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite numerous randomized clinical trials (RCT), data regarding the efficacy of antiplatelet and anticoagulant combinations are still conflicting. We aimed to analyze treatment options tested in various fields of cardiovascular prevention, regarding their efficacy and bleeding risk. Methods: Systematic searches of electronic databases were conducted until June 2022. A component network meta-analysis was performed in R. Risk estimates across trials were pooled using random-effects model selecting risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) as summary statistics. The primary endpoint of interest was the rate of major cardiac adverse events (MACE). Major bleeding events were assessed as main safety endpoint. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular- and overall mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and stroke. Results: Fifteen studies randomizing 73,536 patients were identified. The MACE risk reflected heterogeneity among the anticoagulants with dabigatran and apixaban significantly reducing the risk of MACE (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.39-0.80 and RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58-0.98, respectively). Vitamin K antagonist (VKA), rivaroxaban, or edoxaban did not reduced of MACE while it was associated with a significant increase of bleeding risk (RR 1.66; 3.66, and 5.47, respectively). The direct anticoagulant (DOAC) dose reduction resulted in tendencies of fewer bleeding but higher MACE risk, while combination with aspirin was followed with increased risk for bleeding, however, remained non-significant in these cases. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis supports that the ischemic-bleeding balance is different among direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) while this is not significantly affected by the dose reduction approaches. Long-term aspirin treatment as part of the anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet regimen provides no ischemic benefit but may increase bleeding risk. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [259703].

Indexed as

anticoagulant therapyantiplateletcombination (combined) therapymeta-analysispercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Identifiers

PMID36568540
PMCPMC9773199
OpenAlexW4311865077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.