ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Outpatient monitoring of patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C): A mini review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress on Coronary Artery Injury and Myocardial Ischemia in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Outpatient Pediatric Cardiology Follow-Up of Patients with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C): A Single-Institution, Medium-Term Follow-Up Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- One-Year Follow-Up Results of MIS-C Patients with Coronary Artery Involvement: A Multi-center Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Six-month multidisciplinary follow-up in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: An Italian single-center experience.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As we learn more about the novel multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19 infection, the protocols for long-term follow-up have evolved and only some of these protocols have been published. Here, we review the current literature on follow-up guidelines in MIS-C patients. Methods: We conducted a PUBMED search of all articles published on "MIS-C" and the term "follow-up" between 2020 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were that (1) the study was an observational study or case series, and (2) the study population included pediatric population who met the diagnostic criteria for MIS-C. Results: There were 206 publications on MIS-C and follow-up in the last 2 years with 11 studies that fit the inclusion criteria. These papers were representing 11 different centers and encompassed a total of 343 participants. Seven of the 11 studies had participants follow-up with their cardiologist within 1 month of discharge. Between 12% and 62% of patients within each study had depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at admission. At the initial follow-up visit, five studies showed a normal LVEF in all patients while the other seven studies showed 2%-13% patients continuing to have depressed LVEF. In eight of the 11 studies, 9%-52% of patients had coronary artery dilation at admission. At their initial follow-up visit, 3%-28% of patients continued to have coronary artery dilation. Conclusion: There is some institutional variation in the outpatient follow-up protocols in patients diagnosed with MIS-C. A standardized follow-up guidelines might be helpful to monitor long-term prognosis of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.