ArticleCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery2022
Erythropoietin administration exerted neuroprotective effects against cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury.
Article in Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in organ protection: ischemic preconditioning and erythropoietin as protective strategies.International urology and nephrology · 2025Review
- Personalized Therapeutic Advances in Erythropoietin Signaling: From Anemia Management to Extensive Clinical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Chronic Administration of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Induces Angiogenesis in Healthy Mouse Brain.Cureus · 2024Article
- Potential Role of Natural Antioxidants in Countering Reperfusion Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Stroke.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) leads to cardiac dysfunction and also causes brain dysfunction and pathology. The neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin (EPO), the hormone controlling the production of red blood cells, have been shown in case of cerebral ischemic/reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, the effects of EPO on the brain pathologies induced by cardiac I/R injury have not been investigated. We hypothesized that the administration of EPO attenuates brain damage caused by cardiac I/R injury through decreasing peripheral and brain oxidative stress, preserving microglial morphology, attenuating hippocampal necroptosis, and decreasing hippocampal apoptosis, and hippocampal dysplasticity. Male Wistar rats (n = 38) were divided into two groups, sham (n = 6) and cardiac I/R (n = 32). All rats being subjected to the cardiac I/R operation were randomly divided into 4 subgroups (n = 8/group): vehicle, EPO pretreatment, EPO given during ischemia, and EPO given at the onset of reperfusion. The EPO was given at a dosage of 5000 units/kg via intravenous injection. Left ventricle function, oxidative stress, brain mitochondrial function, microglial morphology, hippocampal necroptosis, hippocampal apoptosis, and hippocampal plasticity were measured. EPO administration exerted beneficial anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects on the brain against cardiac I/R. Giving EPO before cardiac ischemia conferred the greatest neuroprotection against cardiac I/R injury through the attenuation of LV dysfunction, decrease in peripheral and brain oxidative stress, and the attenuation of microglial activation, brain mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, and necroptosis, leading to the improvement of hippocampal dysplasticity under cardiac I/R conditions. EPO pretreatment provided the greatest benefits on brain pathology induced by cardiac I/R.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.