Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36568251›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haonan Liu, Xiao Ma, Chenyu Sun, Meng Wu, Zhiyuan Xu, Shuang Zhou, Nan Yao, Suya Liu, Xiaobing Qin, Zhengxiang Han

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haonan LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Xiao MaDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Chenyu SunDepartment of Internal Medicine, AMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Meng WuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Zhiyuan XuDepartment of Emergency, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Shuang ZhouDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Nan YaoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Suya LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaobing QinDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Zhengxiang HanDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from January 10, 1966 to May 20, 2022. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the CCRT alone with CCRT plus ACT were included. The literature search, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. The primary endpoints were 3-year rates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Complete response rate, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and adverse events were secondary outcomes. The hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risk (RR) were pooled. Results: Nine studies with a total of 2732 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 1411 patients in the CCRT group and 1321 in the CCRT plus ACT group. The HR for 3-year rates of OS and PFS of the CCRT group compared with the CCRT plus ACT group was 0.72 [95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.44-1.17] and 0.78 (95%CI = 0.5-1.75), respectively. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the complete response rate (RR = 1.06, 95%CI = 0.96-1.16). However, local recurrence and distant metastasis were significantly lower in the CCRT plus ACT group than in the CCRT group (RR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.44 -0.91 and RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.47-0.88). Grade 3-4 acute toxicities were more frequent in the CCRT plus ACT group (RR = 1.73, 95%CI =1.19-2.52). Conclusion: Although associated with a decreased risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis, ACT did not significantly improve the survival rate and the complete response rate with increasing grade 3-4 acute toxicities in patients with LACC. Thus, this ACT regimen cannot be recommended for patients with LACC. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0089/, identifier INPLASY202290089.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapycervical cancerchemoradiotherapyconcurrentmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36568251
PMCPMC9768423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.