ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Establishment and experimental validation of a novel cuproptosis-related gene signature for prognostic implication in cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of copper and cuproptosis in digestive system cancers: novel therapeutic strategies and mechanistic insights.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Role of Ferredoxin 1Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026Review
- Targeting ferroptosis and cuproptosis in gastrointestinal cancers: molecular mechanisms, metabolic vulnerabilities, and therapeutic interventions.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- The unique role of cuproptosis in the prognosis and treatment of rectum adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Cuproptosis-related genes score and its hub gene GCSH: A novel predictor for cholangiocarcinomas prognosis based on RNA seq and experimental analyses.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly malignant, heterogeneous bile duct malignancy with poor treatment options. A novel type of cell death termed cuproptosis was recently demonstrated to closely correlate with tumor progression. To gain more insight into the role of cuproptosis in CCA, we investigated the prognostic implications of cuproptosis related genes (CRGs) and their relationship to the development of CCA. Methods: Gene expression data for CCA were obtained from the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) database. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalized Cox regression was used to construct a prognostic risk model based on CRGs. RNA-seq, qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry staining were used to verify the expression of CRGs in human CCA tissues or cell lines. Further Results: We established a 4-gene signature (ATP7A, FDX1, DBT and LIAS) that exhibited good stability and was an independent prognostic factor for CCA. Seventy-five CCA samples were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the risk score. Enrichment analysis revealed increased extracellular activity in the high-risk group and increased lipid metabolic activity in the low-risk group. Moreover, the 4 signature genes were verified in clinical samples and cell lines by RNA-seq, qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Further experiments confirmed that cuproptosis can significantly inhibit the viability of CCA cells. Knockdown of the key gene LIAS ameliorated the toxicity of cuproptosis to CCA cells. Conclusion: We established a 4-gene prognostic signature based on cuproptosis and explored the role of cuproptosis in CCA. The results provide an effective indicator for predicting the prognosis of cuproptosis in CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.