ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of subsequent-line therapies for advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Anlotinib-containing regimens in HR+ advanced breast cancer after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor progression.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Phase II trial of anlotinib-chemotherapy combination in pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: therapeutic efficacy and proteomic biomarker profiling.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Targeting the Key Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer: From Molecular Mechanism to Therapeutic Interventions.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2025Review
- Continuous Anlotinib Combined with Oral Vinorelbine has Shown Anti-Tumor Efficiency in Refractory HER2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of Anlotinib based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Antitumor activity of anlotinib in malignant melanoma: modulation of angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of anlotinib for triple-negative breast cancer with brain metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The Effects of Anlotinib Combined with Chemotherapy following Progression on Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.The breast journal · 2024Article
- Vaginal metastasis from breast cancer: A case report.Open life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with failure of standard treatment. Methods: We collected the medical data of 56 female patients with the diagnosis of MBC and had failed the standard treatment before. These patients received at least two cycles of anlotinib-based treatment as the second-line or beyond treatment between October 2019 and April 2022 in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. The primary endpoint of our study was progression-free survival (PFS), and it was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. The second end points were disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and side effects. Results: The median PFS time of a total of 56 patients was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.17-8.22months). The ORR and DCR was 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively. In second-line, third-line, and beyond treatment, the median PFS was 11.7 months, 8.7 months, and 4.7 months, respectively. In different subtype of breast cancer, the median PFS was 5.6 months, 5.7months, and 6.4 months in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+), hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, respectively. Most adverse effects were clinically manageable, and the most common events were platelet count decrease (35.7%), hand-foot syndrome (19.6%), diarrhea (19.6%), and fatigue (17.9%). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were platelet count decrease (25.0%), diarrhea (7.1%), and oral mucositis (5.4%). Conclusion: Anlotinib-based treatment showed good efficacy and manageable toxicity in multi-line treatment of MBC patients who failed the standard treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.